The mechanism for Predictive Load Control in the Implementation Framework through Genetic Intelligence

Authors

  • T.Pushpalatha St. Ann’s Degree and P.G.College, Mehdipatnam, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
  • sriramula nagaprasad faculty

Keywords:

Cloud Computing; Load Balancing; OLB; Genetic Algorithm. GA

Abstract

Cloud Storage is a pay-per-use range of resources. The consumer wants to ensure that all requirements met in a limited time for optimal performance in cloud applications that are every day. Load balancing is also crucial, and one of the essential cloud computing issues. It is also called the NP-full load balancing problem since load balancing is harder with increasing demand. This paper provides a genetic algorithm (GA) framework for cloud load. Depending on population initialization duration, the urgent need for the proposal considered. The idea behind the emphasis is to think about the present world. Real-World Scenario structures have other targets that our algorithms can combine. Cloud Analyst models the suggested method. A load-balancing algorithm based on the forecasts of the end -to - end Cicada method given in this paper. The simulator for cloud services or Cloud Sim can be used as a simulator to achieve a low computing requirement algorithm and a better workload balance. A simulation of cloud services is feasible. The result indicates the possibility of offering a quantitative workload balancing approach that can help manage workloads through the usage of computer resources. The next generation of cloud computing would make the network scalable and use available resources effectively. Load balancing, a significant problem in the cloud storage, and distributed workload over

 

Several nodes to ensure that no single resource is overloaded. This can be seen as a question of efficiency, and its solution must adapt to the environment and styles of work to the right balance of load. This article introduces a new approach to genetic algorithm (GA) power loads. When trying to reduce the complexity of a particular task, the algorithm handles the cloud computing fee. A software analyst model evaluated the proposed method of load balancing. Results from simulations for a standard sample program show that the suggested algorithms outperform current methods like FCFS, Round Robing (RR), and local search algorithms Stochastic Hill Climbing (SHC).

Author Biography

T.Pushpalatha, St. Ann’s Degree and P.G.College, Mehdipatnam, Hyderabad, Telangana, India

T.Pushpalatha is an Assistant Professor of the Computer Applications Department (M.C.A.) in St. Ann’s College for Women, Mehadipatnam, Hyderabad. She is Pursuing her Ph.D. from JJT University Rajasthan, India.

References

Desyatirikova E. N., Kuripta O. V. Quality management in IT service management based on statistical aggregation and decomposition approach, 2017 International Conference "Quality Management, Transport and Information Security, Information Technologies" (IT&QM&IS) , 2017, pp. 500-505. DOI: 10.1109/ITMQIS.2017.8085871.

Simar P.S. , Anju S. and Rajesh K. Analysis of load balancing algorithms using cloud analyst, International Journal of Grid and Distributed Computing, vol. 9, No. 9, 2016, pp.11-24.

Maguluri S.T., Srikant R. and Ying L. Stochastic models of load balancing and scheduling in cloud computing clusters, in: INFOCOM Proceedings IEEE, 2012, pp. 702–710.

D. Cheng, J. Rao, Y. Guo, C. Jiang, and X. Zhou, “Improving Performance of Heterogeneous Map Reduce Clusters with Adaptive Task Tuning,” IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, vol. 28, issue 3, pp. 774-786, July 2016.

M.L. Chiang, J.A. Luo, and C.B. Lin. “High-Reliable Dispatching Mechanisms for Tasks in Cloud Computing,” BAI2013 International Conference on Business and Information, Bali, Indonesia, pp. 73-!July 7-9, 2013

S. Mohapatra, K. Smruti Rekha, S. Mohanty, "A comparison of Four Popular Heuristics for Load Balancing of Virtual Machines in Cloud Computing,”

S. Kundu, R. Rangaswami, K. Dutta, and M. Zhao. Application Performance Modeling in a Virtualized Environment. In Proc. of IEEE HPCA, January 2010.

Mohit Kumar, S.C.Sharma , “ Dynamic load balancing algorithm for balancing the workload among virtual machine in cloud computing”, 7th International Conference on Advances in Computing & Communications, ICACC-2017, 22- 24 August 2017, Cochin, India.

Priyadarashini Adyasha Pattanaik, Sharmistha Roy, Prasant Kumar Pattnaik, “Performance Study of Some Dynamic Load Balancing Algorithms in Cloud Computing Environment”, 2015 2nd International Conference on Signal Processing and Integrated Networks (SPIN).

Ojasvee Kaneria, R K Banyal, “Analysis and Improvement of Load Balancing in Cloud Computing”, International Conference on ICT in Business Industry & Government (ICTBIG) January 2016.

Samuel A. Ajila Akindele A. BankoleCloud “Client Prediction Models Using Machine Learning Techniques.”, 37th Annual International Computer Software & Applications Conference, Kyoto, Japan, 2013 [12]. Huahui Lyu, Ping Li, Ruihong Yan, Yaoying Luo,” Load Forecast of Resource Scheduler in Cloud Architecture”, 2016 International Conference on Progress in Informatics and Computing (PIC)

Shakir, M. S., &Razzaque, A. (2017). Performance comparison of load balancing algorithms using cloud analyst in cloud computing. 2017 IEEE 8th Annual Ubiquitous Computing, Electronics and Mobile Communication Conference(UEMCON). doi:10.1109/uemcon.2017.8249108.

Chiang, M.-L., Hsieh, H.-C., Tsai, W.-C., & Ke, M.-C. (2017). An improved task scheduling and load balancing algorithm under the heterogeneous cloud computing network. 2017 IEEE 8th International Conference on Awareness Science and Technology (iCAST). doi:10.1109/icawst.2017.8256465.

Volkova, V. N., Chemenkaya, L. V., Desyatirikova, E. N., Hajali, M., Khodar, A., & Osama, A. (2018). Load balancing in cloud computing. 2018 IEEE Conference of Russian Young Researchers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering (EIConRus). doi:10.1109/eiconrus.2018.8317113

Wang, Y., Ren, Z., Zhang, H., Hou, X., & Xiao, Y. (2018). “Combat Cloud-Fog” Network Architecture for Internet of Battlefield Things and Load Balancing Technology. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Smart Internet of Things (SmartIoT). doi:10.1109/smartiot.2018.00054.

Jiayin Li, MeikangQiu, Jian-Wei Niu, Yu Chen, Zhong Ming, “Adaptive Resource Allocation for Preempt able Jobs in Cloud Systems”, In 10th International Conference on Intelligent System Design and Application, 2011, pp. 31-36.

Shi J.Y., Taifi M., KhreishahA.,” Resource Planning for Parallel Processing in the Cloud”, In IEEE 13th International Conference on High Performance and Computing, 2011, pp. 828-833..

Goudarzi H., Pedram M., “Multi-dimensional SLA-based Resource Allocation for Multi-tier Cloud Computing Systems”, In IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing, 2011, pp. 324- 331.

Gaurav Dhiman, Giacomo Marchetti ,TajanaRosing, “ vGreen: A System for Energy Efficient Computing in Virtualized Environments”, In conference of ISLPED 2009 San Francisco, California ,USA, 2009, pp.19-21..

H. Jin, L. Deng, S. Wu, X. Shi and X. Pan, “Live virtual machine migration with adaptive, memory compression”, IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing and Workshops, New Orleans, LA, 2009, pp. 1-10.

G. von Laszewski, L. Wang, A. J. Younge and X. He, “Power-aware scheduling of virtual machines in DVFS-enabled clusters”, IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing and Workshops, New Orleans, LA, 2009, pp. 1-10.

B. Li, J. Li, J. Huai, T. Wo, Q. Li and L. Zhong, “EnaCloud: An Energy-Saving Application Live Placement Approach for Cloud Computing Environments”, IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing, Bangalore,2009, pp. 17-24. (2) (PDF) VM Allocation in cloud computing using SVM. Available from:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336022132_VM_Allocation_in_cloud_computing_using_SVM [accessed Mar 16 2020].

Downloads

Published

2020-05-26

How to Cite

T.Pushpalatha, & nagaprasad, sriramula. (2020). The mechanism for Predictive Load Control in the Implementation Framework through Genetic Intelligence. International Journal of Machine Learning and Networked Collaborative Engineering, 3(04), 193–209. Retrieved from https://mlnce.net/index.php/Home/article/view/121